Mind control and beliefs: a scientific view of how manipulation effects behaviour within society

Viewpoint Is the alcohol message all wrong

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15265317

Many people think heavy drinking causes promiscuity, violence and anti-social behaviour. That’s not necessarily true, argues Kate Fox.

I am a social anthropologist, but what I do is not the traditional intrepid sort of anthropology where you go and study strange tribes in places with mud huts and monsoons and malaria.

I really don’t see why anthropologists feel they have to travel to unpronounceable corners of the world in order to study strange tribal cultures with bizarre beliefs and mysterious customs, when in fact the weirdest and most puzzling tribe of all is right here on our doorstep. I am of course talking about my own native culture – the British.

And if you want examples of bizarre beliefs and weird customs, you need look no further than our attitude to drinking and our drinking habits. Pick up any newspaper and you will read that we are a nation of loutish binge-drinkers – that we drink too much, too young, too fast – and that it makes us violent, promiscuous, anti-social and generally obnoxious.

Clearly, we Brits do have a bit of a problem with alcohol, but why?

The problem is that we Brits believe that alcohol has magical powers – that it causes us to shed our inhibitions and become aggressive, promiscuous, disorderly and even violent.

But we are wrong.

• Kate Fox is a social anthropologist and director of the Social Issues Research Centre
• Her episode of Four Thought is on BBC Radio 4 on 12 October 2011 at 20:45 BST

• Listen again via the BBC iPlayer
• Or download the podcast

In high doses, alcohol impairs our reaction times, muscle control, co-ordination, short-term memory, perceptual field, cognitive abilities and ability to speak clearly. But it does not cause us selectively to break specific social rules. It does not cause us to say, “Oi, what you lookin’ at?” and start punching each other. Nor does it cause us to say, “Hey babe, fancy a shag?” and start groping each other.

The effects of alcohol on behaviour are determined by cultural rules and norms, not by the chemical actions of ethanol.

There is enormous cross-cultural variation in the way people behave when they drink alcohol. There are some societies (such as the UK, the US, Australia and parts of Scandinavia) that anthropologists call “ambivalent” drinking-cultures, where drinking is associated with disinhibition, aggression, promiscuity, violence and anti-social behaviour.

There are other societies (such as Latin and Mediterranean cultures in particular, but in fact the vast majority of cultures), where drinking is not associated with these undesirable behaviours – cultures where alcohol is just a morally neutral, normal, integral part of ordinary, everyday life – about on a par with, say, coffee or tea. These are known as “integrated” drinking cultures.

This variation cannot be attributed to different levels of consumption – most integrated drinking cultures have significantly higher per-capita alcohol consumption than the ambivalent drinking cultures.

Instead the variation is clearly related to different cultural beliefs about alcohol, different expectations about the effects of alcohol, and different social rules about drunken comportment.

In the UK, heavy drinking is associated with a range of stereotypes

This basic fact has been proved time and again, not just in qualitative cross-cultural research, but also in carefully controlled scientific experiments – double-blind, placebos and all. To put it very simply, the experiments show that when people think they are drinking alcohol, they behave according to their cultural beliefs about the behavioural effects of alcohol.

The British and other ambivalent drinking cultures believe that alcohol is a disinhibitor, and specifically that it makes people amorous or aggressive, so when in these experiments we are given what we think are alcoholic drinks – but are in fact non-alcoholic “placebos” – we shed our inhibitions.

We become more outspoken, more physically demonstrative, more flirtatious, and, given enough provocation, some (young males in particular) become aggressive. Quite specifically, those who most strongly believe that alcohol causes aggression are the most likely to become aggressive when they think that they have consumed alcohol.

Our beliefs about the effects of alcohol act as self-fulfilling prophecies – if you firmly believe and expect that booze will make you aggressive, then it will do exactly that. In fact, you will be able to get roaring drunk on a non-alcoholic placebo.

And our erroneous beliefs provide the perfect excuse for anti-social behaviour. If alcohol “causes” bad behaviour, then you are not responsible for your bad behaviour. You can blame the booze – “it was the drink talking”, “I was not myself” and so on.

But it is possible to change our drinking culture. Cultural shifts happen all the time, and there is extensive evidence (again from carefully controlled experiments, conducted in natural settings such as bars and nightclubs) to show that it doesn’t take much to effect dramatic changes in how people behave when they drink.

“Start Quote

Alcohol education will have achieved its ultimate goal not when young people in this country are afraid of alcohol and avoid it because it is toxic and dangerous, but when they are frankly just a little bit bored by it”

These experiments show that even when people are very drunk, if they are given an incentive (either financial reward or even just social approval) they are perfectly capable of remaining in complete control of their behaviour – of behaving as though they were totally sober.

To achieve these changes, we need a complete and radical re-think of the aims and messages of all alcohol-education campaigns. So far, these efforts have perpetuated or even exacerbated the problem, because almost all of them simply reinforce our beliefs about the magical disinhibiting powers of alcohol.

The drinkaware website, for example, warns young people that a mere three pints of beer (ie a perfectly normal evening out) “can lead to anti-social, aggressive and violent behaviour”, that “you might start saying things you don’t mean and behaving out of character”, that alcohol is implicated in a high percentage of sexual offences and street crimes, and that the morning after “you may wonder what you did the night before”.

I would like to see a complete change of focus, with all alcohol-education and awareness campaigns designed specifically to challenge these beliefs – to get across the message that a) alcohol does not cause disinhibition (aggressive, sexual or otherwise) and that b) even when you are drunk, you are in control of and have total responsibility for your actions and behaviour.

Alcohol education will have achieved its ultimate goal not when young people in this country are afraid of alcohol and avoid it because it is toxic and dangerous, but when they are frankly just a little bit bored by it, when they don’t need to be told not to binge-drink vodka shots, any more than they now need to be told not to swig down 15 double espressos in quick succession.

Even the silliest teenagers would not dream of doing that. And not because they have been educated about the dangers of a caffeine overdose – although there undoubtedly are such dangers – but because it would just be daft, what would be the point?

What we should be aiming for is a culture where you don’t need alcohol-education programmes, any more than we now need coffee or tea education programmes.

If I were given total power, I could very easily engineer a nation in which coffee would become a huge social problem – a nation in which young people would binge-drink coffee every Friday and Saturday night and then rampage around town centres being anti-social, getting into fights and having unprotected sex in random one-night stands.

There are cultures where drinking is not associated with violence

I would restrict access to coffee, thus immediately giving it highly desirable forbidden-fruit status. Then I would issue lots of dire warnings about the dangerously disinhibiting effects of coffee.

I would make sure everyone knew that even a mere three cups (six “units”) of coffee “can lead to anti-social, aggressive and violent behaviour”, and sexual promiscuity, thus instantly giving young people a powerful motive to binge-drink double espressos, and a perfect excuse to behave very badly after doing so.

I could legitimately base many of my scary coffee-awareness warnings on the known effects of caffeine, and I could easily make these sound like a recipe for disaster, or at least for disinhibition and public disorder.

It would not take long for my dire warnings to create the beliefs and expectations that would make them self-fulfilling prophecies. This may sound like a science fiction story, but it is precisely what our misguided alcohol-education programmes have done.

Over the past few decades the government, the drinks industry and schools have done exactly the opposite of what they should do to tackle our dysfunctional drinking. I remain perhaps stupidly optimistic that eventually they will find the courage to turn things around and start heading in the right direction.

This is an edited version of Kate Fox’s Four Thought broadcast.

25 years later, how ‘Top Gun’ made America love war – Article from the Washington Post

 

Now we are being told that we are being mind controlled and persuaded to go to war through movies, and it is going to continue unless we tell them that we no longer want them do this to us. It can only continue to happen if we stay silent.

Article from the Washing Post

By David Sirota, Published: August 27

Americans are souring on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The military budget is under siege as Congress looks for spending to cut. And the Army is reporting record suicide rates among soldiers. So who does the Pentagon enlist for help in such painful circumstances?Hollywood.

In June, the Army negotiated a first-of-its-kind sponsorship deal with the producers of “X-Men: First Class,” backing it up with ads telling potential recruits that they could live out superhero fantasies on real-life battlefields. Then, in recent days, word leaked that the White House has been working with Oscar-winning director Kathryn Bigelow on an election-year film chronicling the operation that killed Osama bin Laden.

A country questioning its overall military posture, and a military establishment engaging in a counter-campaign for hearts and minds — if this feels like deja vu, that’s because it’s taking place on the 25th anniversary of the release of “Top Gun.”

That Jerry Bruckheimer blockbuster, made in collaboration with the Pentagon, came out in the mid-1980s, when polls showed many Americans expressing doubts about the post-Vietnam military and about the constant saber rattling from the White House. But the movie’s celebration of sweat-shined martial machismo generated $344 million at the box office and proved to be a major force in resuscitating the military’s image.

Not only did enlistment spike when “Top Gun” was released, and not only did the Navy set up recruitment tables at theaters playing the movie, but polls soon showed rising confidence in the military. With Ronald Reagan wrapping military adventurism in the flag, with the armed forces scoring low-risk but high-profile victories in Libya and Grenada, America fell in love with Maverick, Iceman and other high-fivin’ silver-screen super-pilots as they traveled Mach 2 while screaming about “the need for speed.”

Today, “Top Gun” lives on in cable reruns, in the American psyche and, most important, in how it turned the Hollywood-Pentagon relationship into a full-on Mav-Goose bromance that ideologically slants films from their inception.

The 1986 movie, starring Tom Cruise and Kelly McGillis, was the template for a new Military-Entertainment Complex. During production, the Pentagon worked hand-in-hand with the filmmakers, reportedly charging Paramount Pictures just $1.8 million for the use of its warplanes and aircraft carriers. But that taxpayer-subsidized discount came at a price — the filmmakers were required to submit their script to Pentagon brass for meticulous line edits aimed at casting the military in the most positive light. (One example: Time magazine reported that Goose’s death was changed from a midair collision to an ejection scene, because “the Navy complained that too many pilots were crashing.”)

Although “Top Gun” was not the first movie to exchange creative input for Pentagon assistance and resources, its success set that bargain as a standard for other filmmakers, who began deluging the Pentagon with requests for collaboration. By the time the 1991 Persian Gulf War began, Phil Strub, the Pentagon’s liaison to the movie industry, told the Hollywood Reporter that he’d seen a 70 percent increase in the number of requests from filmmakers for assistance — effectively changing the way Hollywood works.

As Mace Neufeld, the producer of the 1990 film “The Hunt for Red October,” later recounted to Variety, studios in the post-“Top Gun” era instituted an unstated rule telling screenwriters and directors to get military cooperation “or forget about making the picture.” Economics drives that directive, Time magazine reported in 1986. “Without such billion-dollar props, producers [have to] spend an inordinate amount of time and money searching for substitutes” and therefore might not be able to make the movie at all, the magazine noted.

Emboldened by Hollywood’s obsequiousness, military officials became increasingly blunt about how they deploy the carrot of subsidized hardware and the stick of denied access to get what they want. Strub described the approval process to Variety in 1994: “The main criteria we use is . . . how could the proposed production benefit the military . . . could it help in recruiting [and] is it in sync with present policy?

Robert Anderson, the Navy’s Hollywood point person, put it even more clearly to PBS in 2006: “If you want full cooperation from the Navy, we have a considerable amount of power, because it’s our ships, it’s our cooperation, and until the script is in a form that we can approve, then the production doesn’t go forward.”

The result is an entertainment culture rigged to produce relatively few antiwar movies and dozens of blockbusters that glorify the military. For every “Hurt Locker” — a successful and critical war film made without Pentagon assistance — American moviegoers get a flood of pro-war agitprop, from “Armageddon,” to “Pearl Harbor,” to “Battle Los Angeles” to “X-Men.” And save for filmmakers’ obligatory thank you to the Pentagon in the credits, audiences are rarely aware that they may be watching government-subsidized propaganda.

Until this year, this Top Gun Effect seemed set in stone. But a quarter-century after that hagiographic tribute to the military’s “best of the best,” an odd alignment of partisan interests has prompted some in Congress to question the arrangement.

Rep. Peter T. King (R-N.Y.), who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee, recently sent letters to the CIA and the Defense Department demanding an investigation of the upcoming Bin Laden movie. He criticized the practice of granting ideologically compliant filmmakers access to government property and information that he says should be available to all. The “alleged collaboration belies a desire of transparency in favor of a cinematographic view of history,” he argued.

Considering King’s previous silence on such issues, it’s not clear whether he’s standing on principle; more likely, he is trying to prevent a particular piece of propaganda from aiding a political opponent. Yet, even if inadvertent, King’s efforts make possible a broader look at how the U.S. government uses taxpayer resources to suffuse popular culture with militarism.

If and when King holds hearings on the matter, we could finally get to the important questions: Why does the Pentagon treat public hardware as private property? Why does the government grant and deny access to that hardware based on a filmmaker’s willingness to let the Pentagon influence the script? And doesn’t such a practice violate the First Amendment’s prohibition against government abridging freedom of speech?

 

Panel reveals new details of 1940′s experiment – 60 years later.. So what else have they done and are still doing?

Is it a just case of things that can no longer be hidden so they are being announced to us? Or is this article asking for our spiritual acceptance of what has happened so that these sorts of things can be continued. Knowing that most of us will read and leave it at that. Truly many of us are kept way too busy surviving and juggling life’s demands to think much more about it.  This is horrific stuff, but instead of letting it be disempowering we can take back our power by re-blogging and passing on the information, and saying no that we don’t accept what has happened and we are no longer giving our free will and acceptance they need to continue.

Thanks to Vigilant Citizen’s website for sounding the alert.

Panel reveals new details of 1940′s experiment

http://news.yahoo.com/panel-reveals-details-1940s-experiment-012040543.html

ATLANTA (AP) — A presidential panel on Monday disclosed shocking new details of U.S. medical experiments done in Guatemala in the 1940s, including a decision to re-infect a dying woman in a syphilis study.
The Guatemala experiments are already considered one of the darker episodes of medical research in U.S. history, but panel members say the new information indicates that the researchers were unusually unethical, even when placed into the historical context of a different era.
“The researchers put their own medical advancement first and human decency a far second,” said Anita Allen, a member of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.
From 1946-48, the U.S. Public Health Service and the Pan American Sanitary Bureau worked with several Guatemalan government agencies to do medical research — paid for by the U.S. government — that involved deliberately exposing people to sexually transmitted diseases.
The researchers apparently were trying to see if penicillin, then relatively new, could prevent infections in the 1,300 people exposed to syphilis, gonorrhea or chancroid. Those infected included soldiers, prostitutes, prisoners and mental patients with syphilis.
The commission revealed Monday that only about 700 of those infected received some sort of treatment. Also, 83 people died, although it’s not clear if the deaths were directly due to the experiments.
The research came up with no useful medical information, according to some experts. It was hidden for decades but came to light last year, after a Wellesley College medical historian discovered records among the papers of Dr. John Cutler, who led the experiments.
President Barack Obama called Guatemala’s president, Alvaro Colom, to apologize. He also ordered his bioethics commission to review the Guatemala experiments. That work is nearly done. Though the final report is not due until next month, commission members discussed some of the findings at a meeting Monday in Washington.
They revealed that some of the experiments were more shocking than was previously known.
For example, seven women with epilepsy, who were housed at Guatemala’s Asilo de Alienados (Home for the Insane), were injected with syphilis below the back of the skull, a risky procedure. The researchers thought the new infection might somehow help cure epilepsy. The women each got bacterial meningitis, probably as a result of the unsterile injections, but were treated.
Perhaps the most disturbing details involved a female syphilis patient with an undisclosed terminal illness. The researchers, curious to see the impact of an additional infection, infected her with gonorrhea in her eyes and elsewhere. Six months later she died.
Dr. Amy Gutmann, head of the commission, described the case as “chillingly egregious.”
During that time, other researchers were also using people as human guinea pigs, in some cases infecting them with illnesses. Studies weren’t as regulated then, and the planning-on-the-fly feel of Cutler’s work was not unique, some experts have noted.
But panel members concluded that the Guatemala research was bad even by the standards of the time. They compared the work to a 1943 experiment by Cutler and others in which prison inmates were infected with gonorrhea in Terre Haute, Ind. The inmates were volunteers who were told what was involved in the study and gave their consent. The Guatemalan participants — or many of them — received no such explanations and did not give informed consent, the commission said.
The commission is working on a second report examining federally funded international studies to make sure current research is being done ethically. That report is expected at the end of the year.
Meanwhile, the Guatemalan government has vowed to do its own investigation into the Cutler study. A spokesman for Vice President Rafael Espada said the report should be done by November.
___
Associated Press writer Sonia Perez in Guatemala City contributed to this report.

Matthew Delooze – Come Down is Calling: Richard Hammond part 2

Come Down Is Calling

By Matthew Delooze

October 2007

Richard Hammond: Showing his injured left eye. Photo by Mirror News.

Hello,
I recently wrote an article called ‘Getting High…You Can’t Beat it’ In that article, available on this site, I mentioned that prior to the accident suffered by Richard Hammond some subliminal messages appear to have been used on Richard’s TV show, Top Gear. These subliminal messages appeared to be indicating that he would have an accident in the future, which he did.I would like to do a short follow up to the ‘Getting High’ article because the comments made by Mr Hammond, through a press interview that are being relayed through the mass media, seem very ambiguous and coincidental to me.

I don’t like repeating myself but I have to point out again that there is another world operating alongside our own five-sense reality world. For simplicities sake I will call it the 4th dimension. I believe this 4th dimensional world continuously carries out symbolic rituals, through the actions of multi-dimensional entities and their five sense agents, in this world. I call them the Serpent Cult. The Serpent Cult has the means to create symbolic scenarios in this world, which, in turn, creates spiritual energy, and I believe this energy can be harnessed and used against us.
I believe the events surrounding Richard Hammond are pre-planned spiritual symbolic actions carried out by the Serpent Cult. Sadly these symbolic events allow them to spiritually rule this world and physically control the realities, the lives, of all human beings. They do this by using the energy they have got from us, through deceptive means. Anyway………

First of all let us have a look at the actions carried our by Mr. Hammond in the recent past. I don’t want to go too far back but I assure you it wouldn’t be boring to seasoned researchers if I did. That said let us just concentrate on the few months leading up to Mr. Hammond’s accident.

Did you know Richard had visited the Holy Lands and other symbolic places whilst filming a programme for the BBC? No? Yes he did. He was told to search for the Grail and he was paid by the BBC to do so. Symbolically the masses supported Hammond’s quest simply because the BBC is funded by the public, so in this case the masses literally endorsed the symbolic actions of Richard Hammo ‘Richard Hammond and the Holy Grail’ was aired in May 2006 I believe.  Is it a coincidence that Hammond has links to the Templars? I explained in my previous Getting High article that Richard’s surname, Hammond, has occult symbolic meanings, but I suppose that may be a coincidence as well?

The main point I wish to make here, is that Richard Hammond had physically stepped foot in all the symbolic places connected to the Knights Templar, including Rosslyn Chapel. He has literally followed the Templar Trail, again with the full backing of the masses because his ‘grail search’ was financed by the publicly funded BBC I quote the BBC…..

‘It is a quest that takes Richard to ancient scrolls in the Vatican’s secret archive; medieval knights and hidden treasure in the South of France; Hitler’s search for the Grail; holy relics in Constantinople; a psychic in Scotland; a crop circle symposium in Glastonbury; and to Paris where he explores the latest Grail fever phenomenon.’……

In a nut shell Richard Hammond had been up to his elbows in Masonic/Templar matters visiting several symbolic buildings, involved in the occult….and all this  was shortly before he crashed.
They didn’t tell you that on Sky News, when they strapped him to a ‘vampire’ and tried to get him over record speeds of 300.3mph did they? Mr. Hammond had obviously been poking around in famous Luciferic buildings all around Europe, the Vatican and Rosslyn Chapel, to name but two. So he had obviously been, at least symbolically, involved in the use of occult terminology, in his documentary in search of the Grail. Hadn’t he? Well hadn’t he?
Or did he just talk about cars during his quest to find the Holy Grail too? Does the fact that Hammond had indeed been involved in occult symbolism prior to his accident not cast more light on, or at least create more suspicion, regarding the symbolism that has already been pointed out to you in the previous article that I wrote about Richard Hammond? Or is this just all coincidence?

The way I understand the workings of symbolic announcements, or symbolic ritual, leads me to think that because Richard Hammond visited these symbolic places, and because he has read certain occult scriptures etc, he had in one sense, quite literally became a walking piece of symbolism himself. Can you grasp that?
Let’s move on.

Oh before I forget, please take note that the ‘vampire’ dragster driven by Ammon, err sorry Mr. Hammond, holds some very important symbolism just in itself. The Vampire was ‘powered’ by a Rolls Royce ‘Orpheus’ turbo jet engine. I used to work indirectly for Rolls Royce, so here’s another coincidence to ponder on, only it is no bloody coincidence.  ‘Orpheus’ is the son of a sun god (Apollo), so that makes him a sun god too…. what a surprise! A Sa Ra so-to-speak and none come brighter than Apollo!
Anyway to continue…….

Richard released a book in June 2006 it was called simply ‘Can you feel the force’. I had to ask myself… Are they taking the piss here? Can you feel the fucking force? They are taking the piss. Obviously Richard did feel the force of at least one bloodsucker because according to mass media he walked away from certain death crashing a vampire jet car at around 288mph shortly after the book was released! Coincidence is it? Can you not feel the force now?

Just as David Icke would say, ‘only coincidence, nothing to worry about’ …..go back to sleep.
The Daily Mirror has now published an interview with Richard. I accept it is possible that the ‘Mirror’ newspaper may have edited these comments. But is it also coincidence that the interview – another announcement – appeared in the Mirror exactly 33 days (33 being an important occult number), after the accident in which Hammond was attempting speeds higher than 300.3mph?

Why use Hammond to attempt this record-breaking feat to begin with? Its obvious to everybody who watches his show that Hammond likes cars, and he has farted about riding other things and doing half dangerous stunts, mainly for fun and money on TV, but does that make him the ideal man for an attempt on the UK land-speed record? Does it bloody hell as like? It’s a joke and Hammond is no more a racing driver than I am.
Indeed, who funded this record speed attempt anyway? Was it the taxpayer, via the BBC TV license fee again? If this is true, the masses funded it, and by so doing, also endorsed it. The unsuspecting public may yet again have been duped into endorsing symbolism that imprisons our spirit.

At the end of the day Richard Hammond in this world is just a pretty face presenting TV shows, and little more, so to my mind, using him to try and break the UK land-speed record is on a par with recruiting a “Lolly-Pop Lady” to attempt to beat the world pole-vaulting record! (Now that is a thing I’d like to see!)
So what the hell is going on here? Hammond was shoved on the TV show Top Gear for his personality, good looks, his pleasing manner and presenting skills, and all this came about because of a need to increase the show’s ratings, not because he is a professional racing car driver. Sure, he likes to pose in fancy cars, but it’s a big leap from posing and presenting to attempting to beat a land speed record of 300 mph plus, isn’t it? Wake the hell up won’t you?

Richard Hammond: Come down is calling

Has any mainstream media person asked the question “What was a TV presenter doing attempting to break land speed records anyway”? No, the question has not, and will not be asked, but unless you wake up, think for yourself and ask these types of questions (at least to yourself), then there are many questions (requiring answers) that will never even be asked, never mind actually answered. What did Richard have to say in ‘The Mirror’ interview?
Well, I will quote some of his comments below, and leave it to you to check out if the comments are perfectly clear on a five-sense level or if they could be better explained as a subliminal announcement of some kind. It is important to remember here; that we know Mr. Hammond has been subjected to hypnosis in the recent past.  It is also of equal importance to remember that we have been told he has ‘allegedly’ suffered brain trauma resulting from his ‘accident’y, so it is possible the ambiguous comments (below) are really just innocent or meaningless post-trauma babble on his part….although personally, I do not believe this is the case, as it is my present understanding that the REAL meaning behind the remarks are likely to fly straight past your natural five-sense filters to be absorbed directly by your subconscious….which of course is EXACTLY where this information was intended to go!

Firstly: The headlines in the ‘Mirror’ read ‘The Day I Died’
Secondly: The opening comments of the exclusive interview printed in the Mirror read…..
‘ONLY the bloodshot white of his left eye gives any sign of how close Richard Hammond came to death after crashing a jet car at 288mph. Speaking for the first time of the horror smash just 33 days ago’
My ears prick up when I hear of 33 and eyes mentioned in the same article.
Thirdly: Five quotes taken from Mirror interview……

1 ‘My mind was like a foreign place, nothing in it but blankness‘.

2. ‘My nose and ears were full of Earth‘.

3. ‘I was ploughing on my head’.

4. ‘I was inhaling a field‘.

5. ‘I was aware of my brain saying ‘We’ll wave the flag’

Please note that these quotations and others were plastered all over mainstream TV on the 23rd October 2006. Are they meaningless babble? Are they a good description of the accident? I personally believe that these ambiguous, written, quotations were shown on worldwide serpent TV because of their cryptic meanings. The only two alternatives are that worldwide TV and the press wants to show the world that Richard Hammond is showing signs of some sort of brain trauma or simply Richard is still showing signs of the hypnosis/mind control he has been under for months.

Remember that Richard has not actually been seen on TV doing this interview because it was a press, written word, interview. Richard was allegedly ‘In Hiding’ at the time.
So, why the rush to get this written interview out to the public anyway? Why 33 days after the crash? Surely Richard isn’t that hard up for cash that he has to be interviewed – in a secret location – so soon after the event? Where exactly DID this interview taken place anyway? Besides, would you allow your loved ones to be interviewed in such a situation, and so soon after such an accident like this, while they are still alledgedly suffering brain trauma? Was it just for the money?

Picture from Google Books

Richard Hammond’s Book: “Can you feel the force”?

Did it all go something like this?
Hammond family member responding to phone call from journalist…’Oh yes our Richard is still suffering from Brain Trauma, so he may babble a fair bit, but yes, do come and interview him anyway, we ‘don’t give a monkey’s’ how he comes across really, as long as you remember to bring that big fat fee you mentioned’!

(I wish I were joking folks!)

Obviously, if the whole official story about Hammond is genuine then the possible scenario mentioned above is a very good descriptive account of what has gone on. Well isn’t it?
Or is the official story all a bullshit scam just to justify symbolic announcements? If so the scam has worked hasn’t it?.
A link to the ‘Mirror’ newspaper reports is here. Please read it and think for yourself for once.

Another link is here. Please read this one as well.

Symbolic subconscious announcements are not easy to explain to you on a five-sense level. This is simply because it is your subconscious, or unconscious, that is being exploited and takes the information in, that your 5 senses cannot see this.  Illuminati, Serpent Cult, control of the mass media allows them to constantly play around with our ‘subconscious’ thoughts, especially through exploiting the attraction factor of pretty/handsome media stars like Hammond.

Our spirits are attracted to certain famous people and if anything happens to these people we all feel it. The serpent exploits this to its full potential. Diana is a prime example. Worldwide spiritual power can be made to literally weep over a single person. The energies released over such events are immeasurable, and the serpent sucks up every drop.

I do believe Richard Hammond is one of the many unknowing TV personalities who are ‘used’ to supply information from the Serpent Cult directly into our subconscious thoughts. The attention created by the media, using popular people, like Richard, is enormous. Indeed depending on the individual’s score (on an imaginary scale of fame graph), the mass media can easily attract the attention of the majority of a single nation, getting the populace focused on a single, pre-planned staged national event. Similarly, the population of the entire world can be attracted to a particular international event. 9/11 is a good example of a pre- planned and staged event where the entire world’s subconscious was focused on and affected by it – a ‘spiritual surrender ritual’ designed (amongst other things) to extract a massive amount of freely given, emotional/spiritual energy. For those lying in wait, such energy is easily harvested from a shocked planet of grieving individuals.

I believe that our subconscious thoughts (both individually and collectively) create our reality, and this is why we are constantly bombarded with subconscious information from the ’Serpent Cult’. I do not believe for one moment the Richard Hammond ‘incidents’ (not just the crash) are coincidental – they are purposely staged events, designed to affect the mass consciousness of at least the people of the UK, if not the entire world. Details of the Hammond accident were sent round the world simply because of the popularity of Richard’s Top Gear TV show, which is now distribution worldwide due to the popularity of Hammond himself, and his highly rated TV show. This type of attraction value is vital to the Serpent Cult whom require entire nations be subconsciously drawn (energy-wise) to certain charismatic personalities.

It is easy to control the emotions of millions of people via such personalities, if those millions of people can be hypnotically deceived into emotional attachment to well known individuals. This type of attraction can in affect see your personal energy literally sucked out of you. Someone like Richard is especially important to the serpent cult, in that he possess the ability to be attractive to both sexes. You could say Richard Hammond is perfect stooge – a walking, talking serpent symbol, and one that pays dividends to those with vested interests.
As I said earlier, what I am trying to relay here is not easy to explain using the 5-sense, ‘brain-washed’ reality most people function on, through the text of this article. It is not by accident that most cannot comprehend how all this works on the deeper level required, but unless you become aware of how this ‘deeper stuff’ works, and how these mass rituals transposes into our present understanding of controlled-reality, this stuff will continue to whiz straight over your head. Even if you think you have grasped what I am saying here, you may still need to allow time for your subconscious to fully absorb this information in order to form a better understanding. All this will take is a willingness to learn on your part. I am not saying you are thick or stupid, I am as daft as anyone else who has been mentally and spiritually manipulated in this world, I am saying you have been massively deceived on a subconscious level and it will take quite a while to come to terms with this and change it.

Those who are struggling at this point may feel inclined to bugger off back to their watch Sky TV to see the ‘official version’ of the news being spewed out daily, and by all means do so if you must. But those who are still interested, please read on as we venture further down the rabbit hole.
The newspaper selected to announce the quotations allegedly uttered by Richard Hammond was the Daily ‘Mirror’. Apparently Richard Hammond has financial and professional links to the Daily Mirror and will undoubtedly have obligations to sell his story to them.
The symbolic reasons forThe Mirror newspaper being ‘used’ in this case is because of the ‘double meaning‘ or ‘mirror image’ symbolism contained in its name, ‘The Mirror’. Indeed if you look into a mirror, left becomes right and right becomes left.
Right?
This naming of newspapers in symbolic fashion, and the naming of other media outlets for that matter, is also part of the serpent agenda and this trickery is used to get you to ‘subconsciously’ accept a symbolic ‘source’ that the announcement originated from at the time, be it about the Hammond crash or anything else. Of course I can only speak for the newspapers in the UK at this time, but I am sure it’s a worldwide symbolic scam. A paper titled something like THE SUN will on occasion be used (symbolically) to announce that an event or ritual has taken place, if so it is a direct symbolic announcement from the Sun, then the ‘Sun Says So’ ….so to speak. This is only a small example of how manipulation of the subconscious is carried out using media names and symbolic events. The source of an announcement printed in the Sun is obviously from the Sun, and on a 5-sense level this means very little to us, but on in terms of symbolic/subconscious level, this equates to an announcement from “The Sun God” and your subconscious will store and understand the information as such.

In this case the story/interview of Mr. Hammond (in 5-sense reality) was published by ‘THE MIRROR’ newspaper, on a conscious level it is just a printed story in the Mirror newspaper. But on a subconscious level we are reading an announcement from an actual ‘mirror’….and I am sorry to lay that on you, but its true! Your subconscious has acknowledged that it was ‘a mirror announcement’, and I know this may sound daft to some, but this is EXACTLY how this stuff works, and the Serpent Cult understands and exploits what you are not aware of. The Serpent Cult increases your 5-sense reality awareness whilst at the same time decreases your spiritual awareness. This leads you to ignore your spiritual intuition and fully concentrate on the material five sense realities you have been literally hypnotised with.

Picture from Mirror News

Richard Hammond: Searching for the Grail, and over the barrel in more ways than one

So, to re-cap, a symbolic mirror image of the story is being absorbed by the  human subconscious, not only by those who actually read the Hammond article in the Mirror newspaper, but all those who absorbed the same announcement that was relayed throughout the world media via the satellite TV networks, whom by law must name the ‘original source’ of the announcement – in this case The Mirror, who has exclusive rights to the story which must be honoured. For example Sky News’s announcement included the line ‘The Mirror says Hammond said blah blah blah…..therefore the world kept hearing the words “The Mirror” in conjunction with the Hammond story.
The end result, in this case, is that mass consciousness has symbolically and spiritually accepted an announcement from a Mirror, and without any spiritual challenge to question the intent of that announcement, simply because the masses cannot see above the 5 senses. The announcement itself therefore became the accepted version of reality for the masses. This is why so few people now control the world – few are needed when those in control have complete control of your subconscious. In essence, you have already given them the rights to control your mind and your spirit as they see fit and this is all because you are presently unaware of the game constantly being played on these unseen levels.

Naturally, any time the Serpent Cult wishes to make a symbolic occult announcement, it (they) can call on all the media outlets they own to do so using whatever symbolic titles they wish. The other shitty little newspapers around the world will relay the story too, but will be forced (or risk law suites) to relay the name of the original story source. Since over 90% of relayed news in this world originates from the same few people (all using illuminati symbolism in their names and logo’s etc), these mass announcements – which affect the mass consciousness – are dead easy for them and all of this goes on without YOU even knowing what’s going on! A machine of deception being used to exploit YOU!

Are you starting to get the bigger picture now? I need you to look back at the picture of Richard Hammond at the top of this article. See the title ‘The Day I Died’? Look at it carefully.
What does it show you? On a five sense level you will see the face of Richard ‘Hammond’ showing his slightly injured ‘left’ eye and of course the Daily Mirror logo. Simple enough?
Symbolically speaking though, the face of Hammond is actually being ‘mirrored’ back at you. Go to a mirror and look at yourself pointing at your left eye, you will see that what is actually being mirrored back at you is a right eye, right? Try something else. Hold your right arm up in the front of the same mirror and you will see it’s a left arm being reflected back at you from the mirror? Yes?

So with regard to Richard Hammond’s damaged left eye, the eye you are seeing in the photo above is actually on your right, so symbolically at least, it’s his right eye you are viewing. In this symbolic ‘Hammond’ event we’ve been discussing, the image of his left eye being mirrored back on the ‘right’ is (in my opinion) representative of the eye of Amun Ra. (aka Eye of Horus). Amun means the hidden one.  So in other words, symbolic messages being relayed through a mirror (in this case The Mirror newspaper) can be interpreted as meaning the opposite of the 5-sense reality being portrayed.

Are you getting all this, or is all this ‘smoke and mirrors’ stuff just too far fetched for you?
Maybe it is, but I tell you the truth, and remember we are talking about the complete physical and spiritual control of the entire human race here, not just Richard Hammond’s pretty face. These symbolic situations are easy to create by multi-dimensional forces, and their powerful agents on Earth and their rewards for doing so are enormous, far beyond your current comprehension

Also remember that ‘they’ created 9/11, so creating the means for some pretty little TV presenter, (and the symbolism surrounding him), to crash in a racing car is really just a simple walk in the park to them. That said the symbolism used through Richard Hammond is just as important to the serpent agenda as any other. Indeed I believe the symbolic meanings surrounding Hammond’s fate are leading to something even bigger than the horrific events of 9/11. I said this in the previous article I wrote about Richard and the symbolism aired on Top Gear. My belief in that statement has increased. We are dealing with very powerful Sun God symbolism here and not the airy-fairy symbolism on the wrapper of a candy bar. The Serpent Cult mean business. They mean BIG business!

Photo by The Daily Mail

Richard Hammond in good hands

Since I wrote my last article on this topic, my belief in another, bigger, 9/11 event has strengthened, and I maintain my belief that Richard Hammond and his TV show Top Gear have been used for occult symbolism and for a Luciferic announcement. In that article I explained Mr. Hammond’s name is symbolic for ‘Ammon’ or ‘Amun’. (Amun – the hidden one)?
Amun, or Hammon, was originally known as the Egyptian God of Air who became known as the ‘breath of life’. Then Hammon moved upwards through the symbolic ranks to the god of fertility, finishing up being known as Amun Ra. (One of the main symbols of Luciferic energy.)

I believe the whole scenario – the hypnosis of Hammond, the symbolic 9/11’s, the accident itself, the 300.3 mph and even the 33 days before Hammond ‘shows you his eye in the Mirror’ – is all about symbolic subliminal messages. I don’t give a monkey’s if I sound crazy for saying these things either, and I intend to carry on doing so.
In my opinion all the things above were ‘arranged’ to come to pass, from our perspective, by malevolent forces (Reptilian aliens) from another dimension. This sort of event takes place simply for these forces to announce their intentions and get your spiritual support/permission to do so at the same time.

Is he a TV star or simply a stooge used for subliminal messages?

In a five-sense reality we haven’t a clue what has gone on because we have previously had our connection to our full spiritual senses cut off by these same forces. We are unaware of what’s going on and because of it, we literally cannot spiritually object to these ambiguous announcements and that leaves us as powerless victims to the physical events we are forced to experience, no matter how much they will harm us. We have been stopped/blocked from doing so, and as a result, we can only see the five-sense reality version of events. Or should

I say the ‘majority’ of us only see the five-sense version of events.

On a five-sense reality level, operating on a physical level, Hammond only played out a silly act under hypnosis on his TV Show and then he had an accident. But on a spiritual level (one that operates on subliminal symbolism), Hammond played the role of a symbolic Sun God – Amun Ra – God of wind and fertility etc, who has stated (for those with eyes that see) that he means ‘big business’ involving a massive event, which is to take place in the future. Possibly in a place linked closely to the word ‘York‘, and again involving two towers or symbolic towers. Again I will state my belief that Richard’s experience, and his TV show Top Gear, has been used for passing on occult symbolism and a Luciferic announcement.

You will remember in my previous Hammond article, I stated my belief that an event bigger than 9/11 was going to take place in the future, and the symbolic announcement for that event was made via the symbolism shown in an episode of Top Gear. I am now repeating that claim here, because when I see Hammon symbolism with comments like the ‘Earth in his ears and nose’ along side of mentions of eyes and 33’s’ (all of it being announced on worldwide TV), I believe a forthcoming massive, brain blasting event, is being covertly announced by the secret rulers of this world, and sadly these announcements are being accepted by the blind ‘sheeple’ on this planet.
Wake up!

I have kept the information in this article as basic as possible. I really didn’t want to write it. I just felt I had to. Mind you it would have been far easier for me just to post the picture below.
In case you still have any doubts about what Richard Hammond is being used for, below is a photo of Hammond being used by the mass media, and it clearly shows just what a puppet Richard Hammond is for the Serpent agenda, whether he knows it or not. Doesn’t this picture say it all to those with opened eyes who understand symbolism? Richard Hammond at the wheel of a vehicle ‘carrying’ the symbolism of the Serpent agenda.

Photo by Sky News

Handsome Man or messenger for the occult

The pyramid and the skull and bones give it away, just a tad!
What do you see in the picture above? The attractive and dashing Richard Hammond? Or can you see what he is carrying, his symbolic cargo? These are easy questions aren’t they? Unless of course you close your eyes! I tell you the truth and its jolly-well time to open your eyes and choose to ‘see’ it or not! You won’t have that option for much longer.

I thank you for reading this article, as I mentioned above, it was very difficult for me to write. I hope my efforts help some of you ‘out there’ come to terms with what’s really is going on right under their noses.

My best wishes go to you all.

Sincerely
Matthew Delooze
October 2007

  All Text Copyright © Matthew Delooze, 2007. All Rights Reserved.

(Note from Aeve: The original pictures used by the author have been lost, I have replaced some of them and hopefully they are what the author would have intended).
If you’re new to Matthew’s work it’s recommended to start here first

Click here for links to more articles by Matthew Delooze on this blog

The original article is available as an archived copy of Oneball Radio Website and you can find more of Matthew’s work there.

Matthew has written three books available as download and paperback for low cost on Lulu Books

Matthew Delooze – Getting High… You Can’t Beat It: Richard Hammond Part 1. 9/11 and Hypnosis

Getting High… You Can’t Beat It

By Matthew Delooze

September 2006

Photo by Ted Perchick

When the accident happened to Richard Hammond a presenter of Top Gear in the UK my ears pricked up but due to the circumstances I was in at the time I put my thoughts on the back burner.
As I have previously stated in other articles ( www.experiencers.net) I believe there is another world , invisible to the naked eye, running alongside our 5 sense reality world. This other world , the 4th dimension if you like, dictates the way our 5 sense reality world works. To do this it has to make symbolic announcements and have the consent of the majority of human minds to rule us. Our permission so to speak. Sadly this 4th dimensional world has been infested and deceives the human race into living as spiritual slaves serving their aims. One popular way of implanting spiritual triggers in the minds of the masses is via TV. Especially popular shows that are aired all over the world.
So stepping back from hype and the shock news of Mr Hammond’s ‘accident’ I tried to find some symbolic 4th dimensional reason for such a thing happening.

I was strongly directed to this video as a ‘must watch’. A sort of ‘watch this bugger and you will start to see how things are covertly put into TV shows right under your nose without you having the slightest clue’ came in to my mind.
Please watch the video all the way through via the link below.
http://www.boreme.com/posting.php?id=8896
Watched it all then have we? What do you think? On the surface its just a clip from an episode of Top Gear isn’t it? Top Gear goes out to millions of minds worldwide. The format of the programme has changed in recent years to attract younger viewers and of course women. Hence the dashingly handsome Richard Hammond helping to present it. Not that I don’t know a lot of women are really ‘into’ cars these days and I am not suggesting all you women tune into Top Gear just to drool over handsome presenters. I wouldn’t dare!
Anyway first off, in the video, we are shown that Richard Hammond is capable of being mind controlled (hypnotised) at the wheel. It’s there right in your face. It doesn’t matter if Richard Hammond is playing to the camera, and he is not hypnotised at all, and he certainly could be playing to the camera but I personally don’t think he is.
The fact is that millions of minds have seen him symbolically being ‘controlled’ at the wheel and accepted it in their subconscious. The memory may have disappeared from their 5 sense conscious memory soon after the show finished but it has been ‘announced’ in the subconscious of millions of people and indeed accepted as such.
Further on in the video Mr Hammond is hypnotised (mind controlled) again in the studio. I was gob smacked when the reference 9/11 was overtly used (through reference to a toy Porsche 911 and the pre planned script) several times. Indeed did you notice two towers are present in the video of the episode (no you didn’t did you?) when the many references to 9/11 is made. I realise these towers will be claimed to be necessary equipment by the producers but this is not really true is it?

( Hammond mind controlled at the wheel by McKenna)

Anyway just think of what information is going into the deep subconscious of all those watching Top Gear. 9/11? Twin Towers? Mind controlled driver? OK. Coincidence it may be…Let us go a little deeper because coincidences seem to be rife in this matter.
Please note when Mr Hammond is driving his 9/11 in the video a bigger vehicle comes along and overpowers it by smashing into it (symbolised by Mr Clarkson crashing into Hammond), again this takes place between the two towers. Could this symbolise that a more powerful event than 9/11 is to take place and unseen 4th dimensional forces are announcing it through covert symbolism in the subconscious of the masses? Is this a strong indication as to how our minds are implanted with symbolism which in turn creates our reality (without us even knowing).
This covert symbolism has been implanted in the subconscious of the millions of people and the top gear video is only one small example of how these things work. That said I believe it’s a very good example of how it works and if you can grasp the idea of how it works now it will be easier to spot later on. Mad I may be, but daft I’m not. That is why I am trying to point it out to you via the Top Gear video.
Again this video is only one example, indeed a good one, but only one. The same sort of symbolism will be spewed out in several other ways until it has been implanted in the vast majority of the collective ‘subconscious‘, or if you prefer the collective, ‘unconscious’ of the human race.

(the symbolic twin towers and the symbolic 9/11)

In my opinion a combination of occult symbolism and numerology can be implanted in peoples minds(mass consciousness, to create the energy need to create the physical events in our 5 sense reality. Our collective thoughts create our reality. At the same time the mental symbolism implanted in us receives no spiritual objection from us (because we fail to understand its meaning) thus the situation attracts the spiritual permission of the masses for these events to take place in 5 sense reality after we have accepted them into our subconscious without protest. ‘What the masses think they get , they get’ and the serpent exploits this to its full potential. While we are scratching our arses and laughing at McKenna’s victims the serpent is abusing your mind and creating your physical reality. Wake up. Please wake up.
I am not for one minute suggesting that Richard Hammond knows anything about this thing above a 5 sense level, nor Mr Clarkson. They, like most other unknowing TV stooges, haven’t a clue.
In 5 sense reality… he drove his car and crashed it and the serpent cult media had nothing to do with bringing all these symbolic coincidences together in a popular TV Show watched by millions of people. Yes right Ok.

The fact is that scripts for TV shows are provided on the orders of the very top brass of the TV networks.
Mr Hammond was in my opinion selected to play out this symbolism because he fitted the profile the serpent wanted displayed and announced in this scenario, or announcement, on a worldwide basis. Indeed the accident involving Mr Hammond received worldwide press coverage and there are more official news video’s on this matter on the than there was on the official 9/11 in 2001.
Anyways let us also look at some surname symbolism involved in this matter as ‘Hammond’ struck a chord with me straight away . Simply because I have heard about ‘Hammon’ many times before. Believe me I have known this name since the late 90’s and if it is mentioned, or a similar version of it, is used in similar accidents or murders then please take note of it for future reference.
There are some variations of the name here.
http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.fc/qx/hammon-family-crest.htm
‘Hammon’, a variation of Hammond, has very symbolic links to the ancient past. Also known as Baal Hammon. Time and time again I have found there is a symbolic link to ancient deities or places when a high profile murder( affecting mass consciousness) or high profile accident takes place.
Coincidence is it? I wish I could stop finding these coincidences and give my weary head a rest,…. ‘it’s a wonder I am still sane‘…

(Serpent stooges are used for the most bizarre covert acts of symbolism..example Hammon and 9/11)

Where was I? Oh yes…. Coincidences? What have we had so far? Oh yes… symbolic 9/11? Mind controlled drivers? Twin towers? Strange coincidences with surnames. Baal Hammon/Hammond. I suppose we need some official occult numbers to throw in this event just to put the cat among the pigeons and get you thinking slightly more upwards. Unless ‘Deal or no Deal’ is on TV of course. Isn’t that the latest worldwide TV game show that wants to feed our lust for cash or our fear of debt? Taken over from who wants to be a millionaire for a quarter of the price has it?. They must be buying our minds for a far cheaper price than they used to. ‘Noel’ is really Santa Clause is he?

Ok then lets have the occult/serpent number connection to the symbolism surrounding this ‘accident’. Well first of all Mr Hammond was trying to beat a UK land speed record. A record set previously by a ‘Vampire’ dragster driven by Colin Fallows. I believe Mr Hammond was driving the same Vampire model on the day of his accident.
The speed record Hammond was trying to beat? 300.3 MPH. Yes I am afraid its all the three’s again folks (Mason’s Degrees or dirty knees in Bingo terms!) Now that is getting rather high up the degree ladder and Richard Hammond, couldn’t beat it. He was doomed from the start.

So let us recap on the blatant and covert symbolism presented on TV and let me point out I am NOT making any of this up? We have a handsome presenter who, prior to a very serious accident, was hypnotised( mind controlled) in front of millions of people whilst at the wheel of a car.Yes?
He performed a really silly act in front of two towers, also whilst mind controlled, and 9/11 was quoted several times. Yes? Eerily in my opinion the symbolism also indicated that a larger event will overshadow the 9/11 tragedy by the fact that Mr Clarkson’s vehicle smashed into the 9/11 driven by Mr Hammond in front of the twin towers.Yes? I realise that latter statement may seem daft but we are dealing with symbolism that affects the subconscious and not your programmed 5 sense reality. The same ‘conditioned’ 5 sense reality that makes you immediately fob off such info as a load of shite because you have been programmed to do so.
Also the name Hammon is very symbolic to ancient times and I believe, nay i know, Hammon is linked to Moloch and ritual sacrifice.Yes? The 300.3 miles per hour is obviously automatic recognition of the freemasonry 33 degrees.Yes? I don’t need to remind seasoned researchers that freemasonry is a major player for the serpent loving , sun worshipping, Luciferians.

( the 911 event was nothing compared to what’s coming eh?)

Mind you on a lighter note, or even a more serious one, I really only needed to show you one clip from the video that will get you thinking(see below). It’s the bloody personalised number plate used on the car that the hypnotised Hammond was driving in the TV show. Were the producers of this show psychic when they filmed Hammond driving with the plate ‘S 999 BAD’? Now then, my little Noddy Car lovers, was the number plate telling us that the driver was so bad that an emergency number 999 would be needed?
Or was it reversed numerology 666 with the tell tale S or the super serpent?….. 666ssss

Or was it just coincidence? I believe the symbolism in this episode of Top Gear and the later accident involving Mr Hammond has illuminati finger prints all over it. The sad news is that it says to me that a bigger event than 9/11 is coming sometime……. also involving two towers.
I hope Mr ‘Hammon the Hamster’ heals quickly.

For reference
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/north_yorkshire/5366422.stm

I have only showed you one example of how TV can tell your 5 sense reality one thing yet at the same time put messages in your subconscious using symbols event, names and numerology without you having the foggiest idea it is happening. I know its easy to fob this all of as rubbish and/or coincidence , but is it? Is it? I don’t mind making an arse of myself saying these things to the majority of people who will laugh it off or claim I have lost the plot. I want to reach those people that do know these things go on and to take in what they see in this article/video and remember it for their own future reference. Indeed watch the video again now and see if you can spot the symbolism yourself now its been pointed out to you. There is more in it that I haven’t mentioned in this article.

I wonder how much that number plate is at DVLA? S999 BAD.

best wishes

Matthew Delooze

27 September 2006

I have written a book called The Stars Are Falling which is now available in e-book and paper back from lulu publishing.
http://www.lulu.com/content/355241

All Text Copyright © Matthew Delooze, 2006. All Rights Reserved.

(Note from Aeve: The original pictures used by the author have been lost, I have replaced them from Wikipedia and screenshots from the video mentioned. I apologise for the poor quality of the screenshots).
If you’re new to Matthew’s work it’s recommended to start here first

Click here for links to more articles by Matthew Delooze on this blog

The original article is available as an archived copy of Matthew’s blog and you can find more of his work there and on the archive of One Ball Radio.

Matthew has written three books available as download and paperback for low cost on Lulu Books

Matthew Delooze – Alien abductions, remote viewing, spiritual awakening, mind control, mass hypnosis, Part 1/4

Uploaded by paeves on 21 Jul 2011

Matthew Delooze is interviewed by Juilet Nightingale from Toward The Light Radio. He talks about his encounters with aliens both positive and negative that started at a very young age. His spiritual awakening in mid life and experiences thoroughout his life with the system seeing first hand the corruption of people in places of power. He talks also about how the very fact that we are seeing through this deception will help to bring about the freedom from the hypnosis we have been under. Our awakening will help to trigger others to awaken. Please share this video widely.

Toward The Light Radio Archives http://juliet.towardthelight.info/

Read Matthew’s articles at http://ascendingearthbeings.wordpress.com/matthew-delooze/

UV-photons used to communicate over long distances

From www.spaceweather.com

“Rupert Ursin of the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information at the Austrian Academy of Sciences explained to me that the laser was part of an inter-island quantum-cryptography experiment,” says Hattenbach. “Physicists send entangled UV-photons from the Roque de los Muchachos observatory (ORM) on La Palma to the European Space Agency’s Optical Ground Station 144 km away on the island of Tenerife. The goal is to demonstrate the feasibility of quantum communication over very long distances in space–e.g., to the International Space Station or other satellites.

“While the UV photons are invisible to the human eye, the green laser is not: it is used as a tracking laser or a giant laser pointer. It remained visible even in broad twilight – and made a good show together with the milky way, the morning zodiacal light and Jupiter.”

Sending coded information via entangled photons? If the idea disturbs you, you’re in good company. Einstein himself ridiculed the notion as “spooky action at a distance.” Experiments like this one, however, show that it is possible.

Article by www.spaceweather.com

David Icke talks about how we receive encoded information from photons. This is the first part of the talk, the playlist for whole talk is here.

DAVID ICKE – One Love, One Blood, One Heart (One Global heart) Viewer discretion advised

Warning: the beginning of this video can be disturbing with scenes of people being hurt during the wars in the Middle East.. You might want to start watching at 4:28, there is a very good message from David about how we can best serve ourselves and each other by coming together peacefully and no longer serving the system that wishes to keep us at war with each other and enslaved to it.

Uploaded to YouTube by jay4louise2 on 12 Jul 2011

Message from jay4louise2:

“Click here to join the revolution …
http://www.davidicke.com/articles/the-awakening-mainmenu-118/50759-awakening-…
Don’t ‘fight’ the system – heart and dance and non-comply the system out existence.
The peaceful, heart-centered non-comply dance – no violence, no hostility.
http://Music4YourVids.co.uk Free Music from: Music4YourVids.co.uk”

David Icke – Free your mind from false identity belief systems – the non comply dance

Video by jay4louise

DAVID ICKE-MIND PROGRAMMING BRAINWASHING AND MASS HYPNOSIS

Uploaded to YouTube by jay4louise on 3 Jul 2011